Our lecture this week in Sport coaching
pedagogy, saw us look at coaches reflecting and mentoring. Whilst Keith was discussing how coaches
reflect and observe their athletes from a distance, it made me think about what
is more ideal for coaching when providing feedback, especially those in team
sports.
In sports such as AFL, coaches are split to
whether they watch and observe the game from a box up high with their assistant
coaches, before reflecting and providing the players feedback or being on the
sideline to provide instant feedback to players in the game and feeling the
intensity of the game.
So my first discussion point of the week is
there a particular situation were these different observation points are better
than the other? And also whether in individual sports this situation changes
from your experiences?
During Keith’s lecture he also discussed mentors
roles in sport. It’s a role that is now
so common in team sports, as ex-players of the sport are being employed to
nurture and advise young inexperienced players through the beginning of their
careers.
However I ask the question to whether
sporting teams are currently employing mentors as head coaches on their
reputation of their playing days and the team uses assistant coaches as ‘the brains’
and for the planning that is involved or that in fact that the head coach is
the best person for the job?
In terms of individual sports I think a
coach needs to be diverse and be able to serve as a mentor and coach to the
athlete. As discussed in Sarah Taylor and Leigh Sherman's previous blog, although experience in
the sport is not essential when coaching, however elite sporting experience is
as you can relate to what pressure and circumstances that an athlete may be
struggling with.
Anyway let me know your thoughts.
Interesting 2nd point there Hoppa. I think in many cases that is happening. For example, I think Mal Meninga is filling that role with QLD origin. He has coached the Raiders before and had little success. Coaching origin is completely different from coaching an entire NRL season. Mal is clearly an legend and idol to many players and can step in around the origin period and rev the players up to help them perform. How much he has to do with the tactical side of preparation, I'm not sure but I do believe some head coaches may be employed for the mentoring role and leave the assistant coaches to be the 'brains' of the team.
ReplyDeleteWell written Trent
I think your spot on in saying that being on the side line better communicates the feeling/mood/intensity of the situation. I think its becoming more popular because it works. Personally I think that anything delivered face to face is better than over a phone/radio etc.
ReplyDeleteAs for past players coaching, whatever capacity they are involved in should only be criticised if it isn't working. Like I mentioned in my blogs, the coaching role is diverse, so if it benefits the team then the role they play is almost irrelevant.
Trent, these are excellent questions. I think that sometimes words become fashionable so clubs make appointments based on fashion. I think 'leadership' is one of these words. I think 'role model' is too. I believe the mentorship relationship is born out of trust and nurtured by care.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stimulating discussion ... exactly the aim of this e-portfolio idea.
Keith