Hey Guys,
Today I’ve chosen to blog about a topic that
come up in discussion with a fellow blogger Sarah Taylor in regard to coaching
material.
When completing most assignments in sport
coaching or sport science, you will look at journals and books for information
regarding the topic that you are looking for. However, some of the time these materials are
too specific and may not be what you’re looking for, so where do you turn to next?
Websites, videos and coaching manuals from
NSO are the most common as they are specific for the needs, however in most
occasions they are not peer reviewed or backed up by scientific research. Does this mean the information is incorrect
and cannot be used, if not, where is the line drawn to what constitutes valid
material that people can implement to their training or coaching regime?
And I would like to know your thoughts on
your experiences with using coaching material that does not have scientific
evidence behind it and for your coaching or training purposes?
For Example:
Recently when completing an assignment at
Univerisity, I had to coach the fundamental skills of AFL to a novice. When
researching for information on the skills of AFL, there was only research on a
biomechanical analysis of skills or the tactical aspects of the game, something
far to technical for a novice. However when looking on the internet and after
talking to the Development Manager of the AFL in Canberra, I was lead to several
coaching manuals made for the use of coaching novices. Once speaking to the
development manager, I found that it however had no scientific research done on
the methods of coaching or of the ways to teach the skills, however it had been
determined that these methods were best way of teaching this to athletes in
this stage of learning.
Similarly a mate of mine was struggling at
the gym and had an aim of gaining muscle mass. He didn’t go to university so he
therefore did not utilize the journal and books. However through the use of
some useful websites he was able to constantly gain in muscle mass, through the
periodization of gym sessions, changes in nutrition habits and recovery
processes.
Anyway let me know what you think.
Cheers
From my understanding, given that the information/articles are published by governing bodies (aka industry experts/professionals)it can be taken as fairly reliable. Always good to dissect this information though in order to see where we might be able to apply some empirical evidence. Exploring the rationale behind these NSO articles can be great for piece of mind as coaches. I did this briefly with the FFA National Curriculum which you can see here http://aidanscp12.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/ffa-national-curriculum-brief.html
ReplyDelete